The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Determine land management/production objectives
|
|
Other land users, regional land management bodies, landcare committees and relevant stakeholders are consulted regarding regional and local objectives. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Outcomes of consultation incorporating regional and local objectives are recorded according to enterprise guidelines. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives address major land uses and production activities affected by the impacts of the target pests. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives relate to the problem definition and the reduction in the pest impacts and associated losses. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Objectives comply with national, State and regional strategies for land and pest management. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Estimate costs and advantages for the management units most affected by the target pests
|
|
The diversity of land management and production values that the target pests affect within the affected region or area is defined. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely costs of preferred options for control of pest populations and/or changes to land management or production activities associated with each value are documented. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely costs of control are compared with the impacts and losses caused by the target pests. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The management units most affected, both actually and potentially, by the target pests are defined and prioritised. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Define the performance criteria for each land management/production objective
|
|
Performance criteria are defined in accordance with sustainable land use principles to address target pests population levels, economic impacts and environmental impacts. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Performance criteria are realistic and measurable. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Select management options for the target pests
|
|
Options for controlling pest populations and/or changing land management or production practices are assessed and documented in terms of economic factors, technical difficulty, practical feasibility, social and/or environmental acceptability. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A range of management options are assessed in terms of current and future financial support, when control activities are to be implemented, level of target pests population reduction required, and the most suitable control methods and techniques. Completed |
Evidence:
|
A management option is selected in accordance with sustainable land use principles, economic feasibility, integrated pest management principles, environmental acceptability, and statutory requirements for pest control. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Negotiate strategies with relevant stakeholders in the affected area
|
|
The strategy is based on the definition of the problem using data from measurement of abundance and impacts. Completed |
Evidence:
|
The strategy clearly documents the pest problem, the objectives, the prioritised management units, the performance criteria, and the most suitable management options. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Strategies are agreed and confirmed through relevant stakeholder consultation and negotiation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Strategies are published and distributed to relevant stakeholders, organisations and interest groups. Completed |
Evidence:
|